Stanford Study Explains Internet Trolls

Illustration for article titled Stanford Study Explains Internet Trolls

In a study conducted at Stanford, psychologists discovered that people who hold extreme opinions are more likely to voice them loudly than those who hold moderate opinions. At last, science has explained most of what you read on the internet.


Ohio State professor Kimberly Rios Morrison polled Stanford University students about what they thought about students drinking alcohol. What she discovered was that the students with the most extreme pro-alcohol stance expressed their opinions most readily, in general because they believed that they were voicing the majority opinion. But polls showed that the majority of students had a moderate to anti-alcohol stance. When pro-alcohol students were shown evidence that most people didn't support their views, they were far more reluctant to express their extreme opinions.

Said Morrison:

It is only when they have this sense that they are in the majority that extremely pro-alcohol students are more willing to express their views on the issue.


Sounds like this study explains internet trolling and flame wars too. People with extreme views who are extremely loud about them manage to delude themselves into thinking everybody agrees. Morrison added:

You have a cycle that feeds on itself: the more you hear these extremists expressing their opinions, the more you are going to believe that those extreme beliefs are normal for your community.

No word yet on how to break the cycle, especially with trolls, who may not care whether the majority agree with them or not. But we can only hope further research will lead to a simple way to cure extremists of their belief that everybody shares their opinions and wants them to keep talking.

via Ohio State


Share This Story

Get our newsletter



Wow, Mama-san. I think I qualify as a troll as defined by your piece. Annalee, if my self-worth weren't already shot to shit... lol!

—psychologists discovered that people who hold extreme opinions are more likely to voice them loudly than those who hold moderate opinions.

Back in my day, we referred to this as having passions, and once looked highly upon them. Of course, chastity was a virtue then, not a myth, and the country was run amok by Sasquatch....

I've always defined a "troll" as someone who was insulting with their thoughts, and not merely vocal.

It's a serious leap for this psychologist to apply her alcohol study to politics, at least at this point. The study doesn't actually indicate any of what she's hypothesizing, and won't until she conducts the same study on other students in similar situations, and then applies this to other fields outside of alcohol. Please correct me if I'm wrong folks, but I didn't see in the article anywhere that this is what transpired. #technology