Vote 2020 graphic
Everything you need to know about and expect during
the most important election of our lifetimes

Reinvention Of The Daleks!

Illustration for article titled Reinvention Of The Daleks!

Doctor Who's oldest and deadliest monsters are back — and some new concept art shows how the twisted, maniacal minds at the BBC recreated them in a new, terrible image. Plus here's why Doctor Who season five is must-see television.


Minor spoilers ahead...

So at this point, three episodes of the Matt Smith era of Doctor Who have aired in the U.K., and the first episode is about to air tonight on BBC America. If you're just starting to watch the show now, you're in for a major treat. The first few episodes really do feel like a whole new first season of the venerable time-travel show, and Matt Smith's Doctor is absolutely bubbling with energy. Also, Karen Gillan is instantly likable and effervescent as new companion Amy Pond.


One thing that's becoming clear after a few episodes, too — the Eleventh Doctor is a bit more fallible, perhaps, than the Tenth. Not surprisingly, given Steven Moffat's apparent love of the Fifth Doctor, Peter Davison, we're seeing some glimpses of Davison in Smith's portrayal. (Alongside the Patrick Troughton influence everyone's already mentioned.) Smith's Doctor is frequently out of his depth and not sure what's going on — until he makes a brilliant deduction, of course. In the Dalek story, especially, the Doctor is not the know-it-all we might have been expecting him to be.

In tonight's debut, "The Eleventh Hour," we get to see the Doctor tossed in the deep end, with only minutes left to save the Earth from annihilation, with no high technology at his disposal. He literally hits the ground running, although he also drives a fire truck at one point. Smith won us over in his first hour, and he's just gotten better since. We'll have a fuller recap of "The Eleventh Hour" tomorrow, but it's well worth checking out.

And today's new British episode, "Victory Of The Daleks," is tremendous fun as well, mostly thanks to the double act of Winston Churchill and Professor Bracewell, both of them bouncing off the Doctor and Amy. The Daleks have come up with their daftest scheme yet — yes, dafter than turning people into pigs and zapping the Empire State Building with Dalek DNA — and amazingly, it makes sense. The Daleks regain a smidge of the menace they lost during the last few years of Dalek Overkill, and there are deeper mysteries that we can't wait to discover the answers to.

It's an amazing time to be following Doctor Who.


Share This Story

Get our newsletter


This episode left a very poor aftertaste behind that wont go away. Correct me if im wrong but isnt this the 3rd series in a row where the last of something be it a dimensional prison, davros or this...thing was miraculously found to recreate the darleks?

I'm sorry but theres suspension of disbelief then black-plot-hole where no good idea can escape.

There was some strong acting, particularly form the man in churchills role but this was incredibly poor writing based on asinine "tweest's" that davis used repeatedly.

Ive come to think we will no longer get progression in [dr.who] anymore that isnt for advertising a product. this whole thing reeked of "see these new rainbow darleks in your argos catalog by christmas kids! BRING MONEY." I mean whats the point in a 'gripping adventure of the doctor against his enemies' when even if he wins they will be brought back?

This show seemed like it wasnt written by a fan, but a fanboy, who wrote it because they thought it would be 'totally rad' without considering what it represents. Davis used the weak excuse that there the doctors klingons and they always come back.

Not only does the inaccurate analogy lose him some nerd points but the master is the doctors arch enemy, the darleks are more like the doctors gou'ald or however the enemies from early stargate are spelt.

Now i for one loved the ood, they added a new species and it was great, why cant they add a new villain that isnt a freak of the week?

i guess the answer is simple. because its easier to rehash old plot devices than be inventive.