Jeff Goldblum Reveals There Was Almost a Version of the Jurassic Park Script Without Dr. Ian Malcolm

Jeff Goldblum pondering a Jurassic Park without Ian Malcolm.
Jeff Goldblum pondering a Jurassic Park without Ian Malcolm.
Photo: Vanity Fair (YouTube)

Jurassic Park would not have been the same without Jeff Goldblum’s iconic performance as Dr. Ian Malcolm, chaos theory advocate and black leather enthusiast. But though Malcolm’s a character from the pages of Michael Crichton’s source novel, he almost didn’t make it into the film.

Advertisement

According to a video interview conducted by Vanity Fair (on the occasion of Goldblum’s turn in Wes Anderson’s Isle of Dogs, though of course he’s back as Malcolm in this summer’s Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom), Steven Spielberg’s film almost combined Malcolm and Dr. Alan Grant (the character played by Sam Neill) into one character.

“I [read] that Michael Crichton book—Ian Malcolm, wow! Smart, funny, interesting character,” Goldblum says, recalling how he prepared for his meeting with the director. “[Spielberg] was so nice... but he said, ‘You know, there’s a sort of movement afoot... to have that part removed from the script. So since we’ve had this meeting, there’s this little wrinkle that may… render this moot.’ I kind of said, ‘Well, gee!’ I felt moved to advocate for my inclusion!”

Advertisement

Fortunately—after meeting with the uniquely charismatic and apparently rather persuasive Goldblum—the Jurassic Park team realized there was room in the story for both characters. Thank goodness. Check out the entire video to hear other Goldblum gems, including his delightfully theatrical pronunciation of Independence Day director Roland Emmerich’s name.

[Vanity Fair via Syfy]

Share This Story

Get our newsletter

DISCUSSION

michaelcrider
Michael Crider

With respect, you’re wrong, Mr. Goldblum. Without Ian Malcolm in it, it wasn’t a Jurassic Park script at all.

But seriously, the concept of chaos theory was a constant running theme in the novel, it’s a metaphor for the hubris of Hammond and InGen in tampering with super-science. It’s one of the central points of Crichton’s entire writing career. Removing the guy who makes those points would have gutted it, even without Goldblum’s charismatic performance.