Is there more than one of you out there, somewhere?

In a fascinating piece over at Medium, astrophysicist Ethan Siegal waxes mathematical, cosmological, and philosophical on multiverse theory, and its implications for all the iterations of you that may or may not exist:

...would it be possible that there's a Universe out there where everything happened exactly as it did in this one, except

youdid one tiny thing different, and hence had your life turn out incredibly different as a result?It's an incredible notion: that there's a Universe out there for every outcome that's conceivable. There's one where

everythingwith a non-zero probability of having happened isactually the realityin that Universe.But there are an awful lot of

ifs that are mandatory to get there. For one, the inflationary state must have happened for not just alongamount of timeâ€Šâ€”â€Šnot just for the 13.8 billion years that our Universe has been aroundâ€Šâ€”â€Šbut for aninfiniteamount of time.Why is that, you ask? Surely, if the Universe has been expanding exponentiallyâ€Šâ€”â€Šnot just for a tiny fraction of a second but for 13.8 billion years, or around

4 Ã— 10^17 secondsâ€Šâ€”â€Šwe're talking about a tremendous volume of space! After all, even though there are regions of space where inflation ends, most of the volume of the Universe is dominated by regions where it hasn't ended.So realistically, we're talking about at least

10^10^50Universes that started off with initial conditions that might be very similar to our own. That's 10^100000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 Universes, which might be one of the biggest numbers you've ever imagined. And yet, there are numbers that are bigger that describe how many possible outcomes there are for particle interactions.There are 10^90 particles in each Universe, and we need for all of them to have the

exact samehistory of interactions for13.8 billion yearsto give us a Universe identical to our own, so that when we choose one path over another, both Universes still wind up existing. For a Universe with 10^90 quantum particles in it, that's asking an awful lotâ€Šâ€”â€Šfor fewer than 10^10^50 possibilities to exist for how those particles will interact with one another over 13.8 billion years. The number you see above, for instance, is just 1000! (or (10^3)!), or 1000 factorial, which describes the number of possible permutations there are for 1000 different particles to be ordered at any instant in time. Consider, mind you, howmuchbigger this number isâ€Šâ€”â€Š(10^3)!â€Šâ€”â€Šthan (10^1000) is.(10^3)!, for those of you wondering, is more like 10^2477.

But there are not

1000particles in the Universe, but 10^90 of them. Every time two particles interact, there's not justonepossible outcome, but an entire quantum spectrum of outcomes. As sad as the case is, there areway morethan (10^90)! possible outcomes for the particles in the Universe, andthatnumber is many googolplexes times larger than a paltry number like 10^10^50.In other words, the number of possible outcomes from particles in any Universe interacting with one another tends towards infinity

fasterthan the number of possible Universes increases due to inflation.Even setting aside issues that there may be an infinite number of possible values for fundamental constants, particles and interactions, and even setting aside interpretation issues such as whether the many-worlds-interpretation actually describes our physical reality, the fact of the matter is that the number of possible outcomes rises so quicklyâ€Šâ€”â€Šso much

fasterthan merely exponentiallyâ€Šâ€”â€Šthat unless inflation has been occurring for atruly infiniteamount of time, there are no parallel Universes identical to this one.

Read the entire piece â€“ which includes some great discussion of multiverse theory in general, and its implications for our reality as we know it â€“ over at *Medium**.*