Vote 2020 graphic
Everything you need to know about and expect during
the most important election of our lifetimes

Discovery of 4.4-Million-Year-Old Hominid "Ardi" Is Greatest Scientific Breakthrough of 2009

Venerable journal Science has announced its top breakthroughs of 2009, and topping the list is a breakthrough in evolutionary biology. It's the discovery of Ardipithecus ramidus, a 4.4-million-year-old hominid skeleton that reveals how homo sapiens' ancient ancestors looked and lived.

Advertisement

According to Science editor Bruce Alberts:

[The Ardipithecus research] changes the way we think about early human evolution, and it represents the culmination of 15 years of painstaking, highly collaborative research by 47 scientists of diverse expertise from nine nations, who carefully analyzed 150,000 specimens of fossilized animals and plants.

Advertisement

Nicknamed Ardi, the hominid lived in what is now Ethioipa, and is a million years older than Lucy, the ancient hominid sometimes called the "missing link" between apes and humans. In fact, there is likely no one "missing link," and instead scientists have discovered there are many stages between proto-humans and what we would recognize as homo sapiens today.

Indeed, a release about the discovery explains:

After analyzing the skull, teeth, pelvis, hands, feet, and other bones, they determined that Ardipithecus possessed a mix of "primitive" traits, shared with its predecessors-the apes of the Miocene epoch-and "derived" traits, which it shared exclusively with later hominids. However, many of its traits do not appear in modern-day African apes. One surprising conclusion, therefore, is that it is likely that the African apes have evolved extensively since we shared that last common ancestor, which thus makes living chimpanzees and gorillas poor models for the last common ancestor and for understanding our own evolution since that time.

Advertisement

In other words, humans did not evolve from apes at all. Present-day apes and humans are radically different from their common ancestor.

Other breakthroughs this year, according to Science, included:

Pulsars Detected by Fermi: NASA's Fermi Gamma-Ray Space Telescope helped to identify previously unknown pulsars-highly magnetized and rapidly rotating neutron stars-and shed light onto their unique gamma-ray emissions.

Rapamycin: Researchers found that tinkering with a key signaling pathway produces life-extending benefits in mice-the first such result ever achieved in mammals. The discovery was particularly remarkable because the treatment did not start until the mice were middle-aged.

Graphene: In a string of rapid-fire advances, materials scientists probed the properties of graphene-highly conductive sheets of carbon atoms-and started fashioning the material into experimental electronic devices.

Plant ABA Receptors: Solving the structure of a critical molecule that helps plants survive during droughts may help scientists design new ways to protect crops against prolonged dry periods, potentially improving crop yields worldwide and aiding biofuel production on marginal lands.

LCLS at SLAC: SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory unveiled the world's first x-ray laser, a powerful research tool capable of taking snapshots of chemical reactions in progress, altering the electronic structures of materials, and myriad other experiments spanning a wide range of scientific fields.

Gene Therapy Comeback: European and U.S. researchers made progress in treating a fatal brain disease, inherited blindness, and a severe immune disorder by developing new strategies involving gene therapy.

Monopoles: In an experimental coup, physicists working with strange crystalline materials called spin ices created magnetic ripples that model the predicted behavior of "magnetic monopoles," or fundamental particles with only one magnetic pole.

LCROSS Finds Water on the Moon: In October, sensors aboard a NASA spacecraft detected water vapor and ice in the debris from a spent rocket stage that researchers deliberately crashed near the south pole of the Moon.

Hubble Repair: In May, a nearly flawless final repair mission by space-shuttle astronauts gave the Hubble Space Telescope sharper vision and a new lease on life, resulting in its most spectacular images yet.

Advertisement

via Science

Share This Story

Get our newsletter

DISCUSSION

Ornithopterx
Ornithopterx

Ardipithecus's "unveiling" kind of annoyed me in a relatively spiteful way. About five years ago, when I was in college for paleoanthro, some of my professors would occasionally mention the find almost tongue-in-cheek because Tim White and company had been so secretive about it for what was even then nearly a decade. The species had been identified (solely, I think) by dentition (as most fossil species are) from the earlier field season before the skeleton was discovered, and there was talk about it changing everything, but the postcranial remains were like the paleoanthropological equivalent of vaporware—there was big talk but no one was really allowed to see it.

I do understand the need (and desire) to protect one's scientific investment, especially in fields that have a harder time securing research funds, but at some point shouldn't you say "okay, it's time to open this up for input from the community"?

Reading some of the papers, and then watching the Discovery documentaries, it struck me that a number of the things White was saying Ardi changed our understanding of had already changed, or had begun to, even without his fossil evidence. Certainly this evidence is extraordinary, and I can't imagine anyone wouldn't be overjoyed to have it, but is it really fair to call it, at this point, "surprising"?

Like I said, it's kind of spiteful, but I felt like he was suggesting all the work done in the interim between "his" find and "his" paper was wasted, when really suggestions of the same or similar information were being found by other people from other sources all along. I would think that, especially if you've taken so long to share your find with the professional community, you'd want to harp on that because it's independent support and benefits both your research and your colleagues'.