CDC: Big Whooping Cough Outbreaks Could Become 'The New Normal'

Illustration for article titled CDC: Big Whooping Cough Outbreaks Could Become The New Normal

This year, California weathered its biggest pertussis – aka "whooping cough" – epidemic in seventy years (for a whopping dose of perspective, see the graph up top). A new report from the CDC says the outbreak could be a sign of things to come.


Above: A graph depicting the number and incidence of reported pertussis cases from 1946 to 2014, via the California Department of Public Health

It's true that California's latest pertussis outbreak can be hung, to some extent, on the state's crummy vaccination rates – but a new report from the CDC highlights another pressing problem: Pertussis vaccines just aren't as effective as they used to be.


Here's Michael Smith for MedPage Today (emphasis added):

From Jan. 1 through Nov. 26, the state registered 9,935 cases of pertussis, for an incidence of 26.0 cases per 100,000 population, according to investigators with the California Department of Public Health. It's the largest number of cases reported in California in nearly 70 years, the group reported.

Infants had the largest burden of disease, but there was also a peak among adolescents 14 through 16 — the age cohort whose members have only had the acellular pertussis vaccine, they reported in the Dec. 5 issue of Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report.


This peak will come as a big, red flag to anyone familiar with the history of pertussis vaccination. Acellular pertussis vaccines were developed and recommended in 1992, in response to vaccine safety concerns surrounding the reactogenicity (i.e., the expected adverse reactions) of whole-cell pertussis vaccines. The CDC's Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report gives a more detailed timeline of the acellular vaccine's introduction, and its connection to this year's epidemic. Wall of text ahead, but the lengthy citation is warranted (emphasis added):

Notably, the peak age of disease incidence beyond infancy increased to age 14–16 years in 2014 compared with the peak among children aged 10 years during the 2010 pertussis epidemic [Ed.: Pertussis outbreaks tend to cycle, peaking every 3–5 years]. Children and teenagers born in the United State since 1997 have only received acellular pertussis vaccine, and the upper age of this cohort correlates with the peak age in incidence during both epidemic years. Data available since the 2010 epidemic indicate that immunity conferred by acellular vaccines, particularly when used for the primary series, wanes more rapidly than that conferred by older, whole-cell vaccines that were used in the United States from the 1940s to the 1990s. Acellular pertussis vaccines are less reactogenic than whole-cell vaccines, but the immunity conferred by them wanes more quickly... It is likely that increased incidence will continue to be observed among this cohort in the absence of a new vaccine or more effective vaccination strategy.


The upshot: The timing and age-distribution of this year's pertussis outbreak in California adds to a growing body of evidence that indicates acellular pertussis just isn't as effective as its whole-cell counterpart. "As long as currently available acellular pertussis vaccines are in use," the report concludes, "it is likely that the 'new normal' will be higher disease incidence throughout pertussis cycles."

The challenge posed by the waning immunity of the acellular pertussis vaccine was perfectly summarized by Emily Willingham (who has written extensively on vaccines, and pertussis vaccination, specifically) and Howard Hughes Medical Institute senior researcher Laura Helft, in a must-read article published by PBS NOVA in September of this year:

Protecting a community against pertussis requires that at least 92% of the population be immune. Given the complexities of waning immunity, as well as a weaker pertussis vaccine than was previously used in the United States, maintaining that threshold to achieve "herd immunity" is more critical than ever—especially to protect infants, who are the segment of the population most vulnerable to the disease.


Read the CDC's full report here.

Share This Story

Get our newsletter


Dr Emilio Lizardo

Part of the reason parents are willing to be idiots about vaccines is that they don't understand just how bad some of these diseases are. They don't know anybody who is paralyzed from polio. They have never seen anybody die of measles. They don't understand how rheumatic fever changes a person's life forever. So they become more afraid of autism which they see in other children, even though the vaccines do not increase the risk.

It is sad that it may require some young people becoming crippled or dying to open the eyes of the anti-vaxxers and teach them that the real risk of severe illness without vaccines is greater than the imaginary ones they are trying to avoid.