Vote 2020 graphic
Everything you need to know about and expect during
the most important election of our lifetimes

Are humans getting dumber?

Illustration for article titled Are humans getting dumber?

A new study published in Trends in Genetics is suggesting that humans are slowly but surely losing their intellectual and emotional capacities. According to Stanford University's Gerald Crabtree, humanity peaked in intelligence about 2,000 years ago, and we've been heading downhill since then, owing to genetic mutations that aren't being selected against. It's possible that Crabtree is right — but his argument may be a moot point.


Top image from Idiocracy.

First, let's take a closer look at the study.

In the year 5012...

As Crabtree notes, human intelligence is the result of thousands of different genes that arose during the course of our evolution. And indeed, human intelligence — from a genetic perspective — reached its current configuration some time during the Paleolithic era of our ancestry (about 6,000 years ago).

Illustration for article titled Are humans getting dumber?

This level of intelligence was very likely a requirement for survival; those who were less intellectually endowed were unlikely to pass on their genes. As Crabtree noted in his paper, "A hunter-gatherer who did not correctly conceive a solution to providing food or shelter probably died, along with his or her progeny."

But now, says Crabtree, life is easy and we no longer have to be smart to survive and produce offspring. As a result, we are no longer reinforcing the genetic integrity of our intelligence through extreme selectional processes. And it's because of this that our brains are withering away like our appendixes. Given enough time, Crabtree suspects that we will become increasingly susceptible to mutations that will lead to intellectual disabilities.

In terms of specifics, Crabtree has calculated that the 2,000 to 5,000 genes that code for human intelligence will start to degrade appreciably in about 3,000 years — about 120 generations from now. At that point, he predicts that we will have sustained at least two or more mutations severe enough to stunt our intellectual or emotional stability.


Selectional pressures still in effect

Now, all this said, a fundamental problem with Crabtree's prognostication is that it is trapped in a normative frame. His analysis makes little to no consideration for current or future trends, whether they be sexual, social, or technological in nature.

Illustration for article titled Are humans getting dumber?

For example, he completely understates the importance of sexual selection — an ongoing process that most certainly has an impact on our ongoing genetic constitutions. In his study, Crabtree writes that modern Wall Street executives only have to worry about receiving a substantial bonus in order to attract a mate. "Clearly," writes Crabtree, "extreme selection is a thing of the past."


But what Crabtree is grossly under-appreciating is the degree to which intelligence brings couples together in modern society. His Wall Street executive wouldn't be a Wall Street executive without a requisite level of intelligence. The same goes for anyone else with a complex and modern job. And without the ability to survive and thrive in today's highly competitive environments, it's very unlikely that anyone would be capable of attracting a mate.

Moreover, it's unlikely that men and women would mate with someone who suffers from a severe cognitive deficiency. Sad, but true. Subsequently, a case can be made that there are still selectional pressures that favor for intelligence.


Society and biotech to the rescue

But all of this is moot. There are plenty of external factors to make this a non-issue.


First, there's the issue of socialization and education as it relates to human intelligence. As Crabtree correctly notes, "Remarkably, it seems that although our genomes are fragile, our society is robust almost entirely by virtue of education, which allow strengths to be rapidly distributed to all members." Indeed, as the Flynn Effect has revealed, a solid environment will have a profound impact on intelligence (whether it be through health, socialization, education, intellectual stimulation, or epigenetic factors).

Second, there's the ongoing interplay between our minds and our technologies. The web is already serving as a kind of external brain where we're offloading our capacities. It's becoming increasingly unclear where our minds stop and where our technologies start.

Illustration for article titled Are humans getting dumber?

Lastly, there's the potential for technological interventions — and to Crabtree's credit, he also admits that this is a distinct possibility.


Indeed, given that we're already in the era of gene therapies and regenerative medicines, we can only imagine how sophisticated our biotechnologies will be 3,000 years from now. We will most certainly be able to fix (or screen for) any deleterious effects of genetic mutations by this stage.

Thinking more transhumanistically, our brains will unlikely be biological at that point — what will likely be more cybernetic than genetic. Today, there's already talk of synthetic synapses, artificial neural networks, and advanced neural interface devices. And given the potential for cognitive enhancement (whether it be done through advanced nootropics, genetic engineering, or cybernetic implants), we are set to become substantially more intelligent than we are today.


So when it comes to evolutionary biology and the future of our genetic constitutions, all bets are off.


Top image: Inset images via here, here, and Shutterstock/Michelangelus.

Share This Story

Get our newsletter


Corpore Metal

So the gist is because we are using pocket calculators instead of doing sums in our heads, just like relying on cars instead of walking, we are getting dumber and weaker.

To which I reply, so?

You could turn the point around and say that these things that free us from the restrictions of mere human muscle and brain also augment us. Sure, a truck driver might be out of shape and courting coronary artery disease on shitty fast food, but at the same time the superhuman strength of his truck hauls much more, more quickly that vast teams of horses and carts.

The same follows from calculators and computers. Sure the Internet is mostly wasted on cat videos, but at the same time, even now, it's speeding up the process of scientific research and has provided an an easy outlet for a huge flood of human creativity. Can you imagine today's crop of authors and artists, many of whom got their start on Web with comics, fan fiction and such without the Internet?

That our muscle and brain power is being spread to and embedded in our machines and social systems is not entirely a bad thing.