Illustration for article titled All Together Now: DIMETRODON IS NOT A DINOSAUR

Like pterosaurs, ichthyosaurs and plesiosaurs, Dimetrodon, while commonly mistaken for a dinosaur, isn't actually a dinosaur. In fact, unlike pterosaurs, ichthyosaurs and plesiosaurs, Dimetrodon isn't even a reptile, but instead belongs to a diverse group of animals that includes all modern day mammals. Seriously.

According to Emily Graslie – host of the outstanding YouTube science channel The Brain Scoop and Chief Curiosity Correspondent at Chicago's Field Museum – Dimetrodon is a synapsid, a group of four-limbed, back-boned animals that extends back 315-million years on the tree of life, along an evolutionary branch entirely separate from reptiles and dinosaurs. And Graslie would know. She recently referred to Dimetrodon as a mammal-like reptile in front of a vertebrate paleomammologist and, well, it's a mistake she's been living down ever since in the form of the recently launched tumblr "...Is Not A Dinosaur," where she catalogs "mismarketed toys that [she truly believes] have negative impacts on our understanding of early non-mammalian diversity":

Maybe I'm totally delusional but I think with a little bit of fact-checking and a commitment to accuracy we can provide educational opportunities pretty much everywhere. Perhaps it isn't such a big deal that "dinosaur" is a blanket, catch-all term to describe any and all prehistoric life - but I'm convinced we'd all appreciate our early ancestral relatives a bit more if we had a more thorough understanding of how those lifeforms came to be.


Graslie expands in the video above, the latest installment of The Brain Scoop. She drops a ton of knowledge on all things Dimetrodon and the incredible diversity of synapsids, and provides some great, easy-to-follow explanations on scary-sounding subjects like phylogenetics and evolutionary relationships. It's great stuff.

[The Brain Scoop | ...Is Not a Dinosaur]

Photo Credit: Wikimedia Commons

Share This Story

Get our newsletter


Sometimes I'm on the side of accuracy in definitions (whales are mammals, not fish!), but other times it seems futile and silly (what is a fish anyway?). This seems the latter to me.